3 points by eeemmmooo 12 days ago | 6 comments
If I had a say 50,000 sq ft. Building that had up to 1000 people on it at one time. What is the best way to track where each of them are down to a couple inches accuracy. I’d also love to be able to get the direction they are facing as well. This tracking would of course be opted in and I assume would require some hardware that the person wears.
eeemmmooo 11 days ago | root | parent |
Interesting idea. I wonder if there is a way to do the “dots” on the floor idea in a way that people wouldn’t notice them, but the cameras would.
runjake 12 days ago | prev | next |
In the real world, you aren't going to track them down to a couple inches accuracy. There's too much variance in physical materials and positioning, let alone the RF environment.
With that caveat, to answer your question, you'd probably use Bluetooth LE devices that everyone carries. If everyone had wi-fi devices, you could use wi-fi triangulation software. This is usually an add-on package to existing enterprise wireless solution.
You could also do active NFC tags and have choke-points with scanners everywhere.
I have my own Python script at work, appropriately named creep.py, that locates people by wi-fi by logging into our enterprise wireless system, checking what AP their MAC/DHCP client ID/username combo is connected to, gets the RSSI, then runs that through some if/else statements to determine what room they're in to a high degree of accuracy. The script also gets readings off the adjacent APs, as well, for better triangulation. I keep quiet about this script, lest it be used for police state purposes.
The above is a simplification of the script, but if RSSI is approx <=55 or so, then the person is likely in the same room as the WAP, given normal US construction practices. ~65 or so, there's probably a drywall wall between the person and WAP, etc etc. This is an extreme oversimplification, but gives you an idea.
tl;dr:
Your tracking options are:
- Bluetooth LE
- Wi-Fi
- NFC
- GPS devices
None of these will get you to a couple inches of accuracy. Think more like "room-level accuracy".
markus_zhang 12 days ago | prev |
What is the business case?
sloaken 12 days ago | root | parent | next |
Where I work, as a safety issue, if you stay past 6 PM they what to know where, within about 20 yards, you are in case of fire or some other emergency. All I can assume is they have had issues before, and someone might have had trouble hearing the emergency, or needed assistance leaving.
eeemmmooo 11 days ago | root | parent | prev |
Mine would be interactive entertainment.
hiAndrewQuinn 11 days ago | next |
A couple of inches? Realistically, cameras. Lots of cameras and some OpenCV to do the distance calculations.
Bluetooth triangulation is very hard (don't ask me how I know) and won't get you that kind of resolution. Apple's AirTags won't either. Dots painted on the floor at regular 1 yard or 10 foot intervals, in view of the cameras so that calculations can be inferred? Now we're getting somewhere.
The good news is security cameras have existed for a long time, and you can almost certainly find someone to bulk purchase from on the cheap.
If you insist upon using a wearable you may be able to get a light source on everyone you can calibrate towards. I'm not sure whether that's very helpful in practice.